Start Here
New to UAP? Start here.
A calm, plain-English primer on what UAP are, how the story reached the floor of Congress, who the central figures are, and the line between what is confirmed and what is still only alleged.
UAP coverage is loud. Headlines swing between "aliens are here" and "there is nothing to see," and both extremes leave most people more confused than informed. This page is the opposite of that. It walks through the public record in order, says plainly what governments have confirmed, and is equally plain about what remains an unproven claim.
UAP versus UFO
UFO ("unidentified flying object") is the older, culturally loaded term. Decades of films and tabloids tied it tightly to the idea of alien spacecraft, which is exactly the assumption serious investigators want to avoid.
UAP ("unidentified anomalous phenomena," earlier "unidentified aerial phenomena") is the term the U.S. government now uses. It is deliberately neutral. It describes something in the sky, sea, or sensor data that has not been identified, without claiming to know what it is. An unidentified object is not the same as an alien craft. Most identified cases turn out to be drones, balloons, aircraft, or sensor artifacts.
How the story reached Congress
The modern UAP story is a chain of official programs, government documents, and public hearings. These are the milestones that matter, in order.
2007–2012
AATIP
The Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program was a Defense Department effort to study unexplained aerial incidents. The Pentagon has said its dedicated funding ended in 2012. Its existence was not public until 2017, and former official Luis Elizondo says related work continued afterward.
Dec 2017
The New York Times reporting
The Times revealed AATIP and published two military videos of unexplained objects. This is the moment the subject moved from fringe to front-page, treated as a defense and national-security question rather than a tabloid one.
2020
The Navy videos, officially released
The Department of Defense formally acknowledged and released three clips, known as FLIR1 (the 2004 "Tic Tac"), GIMBAL, and GoFast. Confirming the videos are real and unexplained is different from explaining what they show. The objects remain unidentified, not identified as anything in particular.
Jun 2021
The ODNI preliminary assessment
The Office of the Director of National Intelligence delivered the first unclassified UAP assessment to Congress. It reviewed 144 incidents and could explain only one. It did not conclude the cases were extraterrestrial, and it flagged how poor the underlying data often was.
2022
AARO is created
The All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office became the Pentagon's permanent UAP office, with a mandate to collect and investigate reports across air, sea, and space. AARO's later historical review reported no verifiable evidence that any case involved extraterrestrial technology.
Jul 2023
The congressional hearing
A House Oversight subcommittee took sworn public testimony from former intelligence officer David Grusch and former Navy pilots David Fravor and Ryan Graves. The pilots described firsthand encounters. Grusch alleged a secret crash-retrieval and reverse-engineering program but acknowledged he could not show the underlying evidence publicly. Those allegations remain unverified.
2023–
The UAP Disclosure Act
Senators Chuck Schumer and Mike Rounds introduced legislation modeled on the JFK Records Act to force government UAP records into the open. A narrower version became law, but its strongest provisions, including a path to recover materials held by private contractors, were stripped before passage. The fight over full disclosure is ongoing.
The people who matter
David Fravor & Ryan Graves are former Navy fighter pilots who reported firsthand encounters and have testified to Congress. Their accounts are among the most credible because they are named, trained observers describing what they personally saw.
Luis Elizondo is a former defense official associated with AATIP who has pushed for transparency since 2017.
David Grusch is a former intelligence officer whose whistleblower claims of a hidden retrieval program drove the 2023 hearing. His allegations are serious and remain unproven.
Avi Loeb is a Harvard astrophysicist arguing the subject deserves rigorous, instrument-based science rather than anecdote.
Sean Kirkpatrick was AARO's first director and represents the skeptical, data-first institutional view.
Confirmed versus alleged
This is the distinction the whole subject turns on, and the one The Veil scores every story against.
Confirmed by the record
- The U.S. government tracks objects it cannot identify and treats them as a real safety and security issue.
- Three military videos of unexplained objects have been officially released.
- A permanent Pentagon office (AARO) investigates UAP reports.
- Public, sworn congressional hearings have taken place.
- Trained military aviators have reported firsthand encounters on the record.
Alleged, not proven
- That the government holds crashed craft of non-human origin.
- That a secret program is reverse-engineering recovered technology.
- That officials have recovered non-human biological remains.
- That any specific case has an extraterrestrial explanation.
- That a coordinated cover-up is hiding proof of contact.
Now follow it week to week.
The Veil tracks every major UAP development and scores each source for credibility, so you always know where a story sits between confirmed and alleged. Free, every Sunday evening.
Get The Veil Free